IPv6 in Russian FederationThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Russian Federation over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ncnet | 621 |
| 2. | Tunnelbroker | 479 |
| 3. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 447 |
| 4. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 385 |
| 5. | MTS Mobile Moscow and Center | 228 |
| 6. | MediaServicePlus LLC | 192 |
| 7. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Irkutsk branch | 183 |
| 8. | SkyNet Networks | 155 |
| 9. | Rostelecom networks | 144 |
| 10. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 120 |
| 11. | PJSC Rostelecom | 110 |
| 12. | Rostelecom Nets | 96 |
| 13. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 77 |
| 14. | Ntx | 76 |
| 15. | Mobile TeleSystems PJSC / former ZAO MTU-Intel's Moscow Region Network | 61 |
| 16. | MTS Mobile Ural | 61 |
| 17. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 60 |
| 18. | MTS Mobile North-West | 57 |
| 19. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 45 |
| 20. | MTS Mobile South | 44 |
| 21. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 42 |
| 22. | Yandex network | 42 |
| 23. | r105.nas.neo.tgn.pg19.ru | 38 |
| 24. | MTS Mobile Volga | 34 |
| 25. | NTXv6 | 33 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ncnet | 268 |
| 2. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 257 |
| 3. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 254 |
| 4. | Tunnelbroker | 244 |
| 5. | MTS Mobile Moscow and Center | 159 |
| 6. | MediaServicePlus LLC | 96 |
| 7. | SkyNet Networks | 66 |
| 8. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 66 |
| 9. | PJSC Rostelecom | 65 |
| 10. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Irkutsk branch | 51 |
| 11. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 48 |
| 12. | MTS Mobile Ural | 46 |
| 13. | MTS Mobile North-West | 42 |
| 14. | Rostelecom Nets | 41 |
| 15. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 38 |
| 16. | MTS Mobile South | 34 |
| 17. | MTS Mobile Volga | 28 |
| 18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 24 |
| 19. | MTS Mobile Siberia | 23 |
| 20. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 20 |
| 21. | Rostelecom networks | 19 |
| 22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yaroslavl' branch | 19 |
| 23. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Naberezhnye Chelny branch | 18 |
| 24. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 18 |
| 25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 17 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | CJSC TransTeleCom | 28 | 0 | 0.0% | 28 | 100.0% |
| 2. | r105.nas.neo.tgn.pg19.ru | 38 | 0 | 0.0% | 38 | 100.0% |
| 3. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 21 | 0 | 0.0% | 21 | 100.0% |
| 4. | Tis-dialog | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 5. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saint-Petersburg branch | 18 | 0 | 0.0% | 18 | 100.0% |
| 6. | Obit-Telecommunications Ltd. | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 7. | MTS-Blagoveschensk | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 8. | wilhelm.tel GmbH | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 100.0% |
| 9. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 30 | 0 | 0.0% | 30 | 100.0% |
| 10. | Sovintel | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Omsk branch | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 12. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Voronezh branch | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 13. | Hosting technology LTD | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 14. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tyumen' branch | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 15. | Uks-snz | 31 | 0 | 0.0% | 31 | 100.0% |
| 16. | Uks | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 17. | PCCW IMS Limited | 25 | 0 | 0.0% | 25 | 100.0% |
| 18. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 19. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 120 | 0 | 0.0% | 120 | 100.0% |
| 20. | Petersburg Internet Network ltd. | 20 | 0 | 0.0% | 20 | 100.0% |
| 21. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Cheboksary branch | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 22. | Gorizont Ltd. | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 23. | SE Dvoynin Andrey Viktorovich | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 24. | Sedav-isp | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 100.0% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Regit network | 13 | 254.0 Mbps |
| 2. | Ooo "ni" | 19 | 227.5 Mbps |
| 3. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 77 | 100.0 Mbps |
| 4. | CHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone | 7 | 89.6 Mbps |
| 5. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 385 | 89.2 Mbps |
| 6. | Uks-snz | 31 | 89.1 Mbps |
| 7. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 21 | 87.3 Mbps |
| 8. | PJSC Rostelecom | 110 | 83.2 Mbps |
| 9. | Tis-dialog | 6 | 81.4 Mbps |
| 10. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 60 | 79.3 Mbps |
| 11. | CJSC TransTeleCom | 28 | 79.3 Mbps |
| 12. | Yarnet 2a00:84c0::/32 | 13 | 77.6 Mbps |
| 13. | Ncnet | 621 | 74.5 Mbps |
| 14. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Chelyabinsk branch | 16 | 72.0 Mbps |
| 15. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yoshkar-Ola branch | 19 | 72.0 Mbps |
| 16. | SkyNet Networks | 155 | 69.9 Mbps |
| 17. | Rostelecom Nets | 96 | 68.0 Mbps |
| 18. | Metroset Ltd. | 9 | 66.4 Mbps |
| 19. | TTK-SZ/BRAS in SPb IX | 7 | 60.9 Mbps |
| 20. | INSYS network | 12 | 59.4 Mbps |
| 21. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 120 | 56.3 Mbps |
| 22. | Gorizont Ltd. | 8 | 52.6 Mbps |
| 23. | Tunnelbroker | 479 | 43.7 Mbps |
| 24. | MTS-Blagoveschensk | 7 | 43.5 Mbps |
| 25. | New Telesystems, Ltd. | 9 | 42.7 Mbps |