IPv6 in Russian FederationThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Russian Federation over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ncnet | 787 |
| 2. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 621 |
| 3. | SkyNet Networks | 534 |
| 4. | Tunnelbroker | 420 |
| 5. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 386 |
| 6. | MediaServicePlus LLC | 261 |
| 7. | MTS Mobile Moscow and Center | 123 |
| 8. | Petersburg Internet Network ltd. | 121 |
| 9. | Rostelecom Nets | 112 |
| 10. | Vdsina | 112 |
| 11. | PJSC Rostelecom | 103 |
| 12. | Net By Net Holding LLC | 89 |
| 13. | Ntx | 85 |
| 14. | MTS Mobile Ural | 82 |
| 15. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 73 |
| 16. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tyumen' branch | 71 |
| 17. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 64 |
| 18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 58 |
| 19. | MTS Mobile North-West | 56 |
| 20. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 53 |
| 21. | MTS Mobile South | 47 |
| 22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 45 |
| 23. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Samara branch | 43 |
| 24. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 43 |
| 25. | Yandex network | 40 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ncnet | 423 |
| 2. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 328 |
| 3. | Tunnelbroker | 213 |
| 4. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 209 |
| 5. | SkyNet Networks | 200 |
| 6. | MediaServicePlus LLC | 134 |
| 7. | MTS Mobile Moscow and Center | 98 |
| 8. | MTS Mobile Ural | 64 |
| 9. | Rostelecom Nets | 63 |
| 10. | PJSC Rostelecom | 60 |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 52 |
| 12. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 49 |
| 13. | MTS Mobile North-West | 39 |
| 14. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 38 |
| 15. | MTS Mobile South | 36 |
| 16. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 34 |
| 17. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 34 |
| 18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Samara branch | 33 |
| 19. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 31 |
| 20. | Ooo "ni" | 31 |
| 21. | Rial Com JSC | 30 |
| 22. | MTS Mobile Volga | 28 |
| 23. | Petersburg Internet Network ltd. | 26 |
| 24. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yoshkar-Ola branch | 26 |
| 25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Kazan' branch | 24 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | r124.nas.neo.tgn.pg19.ru | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 2. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 53 | 0 | 0.0% | 53 | 100.0% |
| 3. | Ost Llc | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 4. | OJSC "Vimpelcom" | 9 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 100.0% |
| 5. | Petersburg Internet Network ltd. | 121 | 0 | 0.0% | 121 | 100.0% |
| 6. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 73 | 0 | 0.0% | 73 | 100.0% |
| 7. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 43 | 0 | 0.0% | 43 | 100.0% |
| 8. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ufa branch | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 9. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tula branch | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 100.0% |
| 10. | Uks | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 12. | Mobile TeleSystems PJSC / former ZAO MTU-Intel's Moscow Region Network | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 19 | 100.0% |
| 13. | PCCW IMS Limited | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 14. | Hosting Solution Ltd. | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 15. | wilhelm.tel GmbH | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 16. | Teleskan-Intercom Ltd | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | 15 | 100.0% |
| 17. | papa.nas.msk.rnd.pg19.ru | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 100.0% |
| 18. | Joint Stock Company "RuWeb" | 9 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 100.0% |
| 19. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Chelyabinsk branch | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 20. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tyumen' branch | 71 | 1 | 1.4% | 70 | 98.6% |
| 21. | Net By Net Holding LLC | 89 | 2 | 2.2% | 87 | 97.8% |
| 22. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 39 | 1 | 2.6% | 38 | 97.4% |
| 23. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saint-Petersburg branch | 32 | 1 | 3.1% | 31 | 96.9% |
| 24. | RIPE Network Coordination Center | 31 | 1 | 3.2% | 30 | 96.8% |
| 25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 58 | 2 | 3.4% | 56 | 96.6% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 58 | 93.6 Mbps |
| 2. | OJSC "ER-Telecom" Perm' | 53 | 88.9 Mbps |
| 3. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Kirov branch | 6 | 88.8 Mbps |
| 4. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 386 | 86.8 Mbps |
| 5. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tula branch | 20 | 85.2 Mbps |
| 6. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 45 | 77.1 Mbps |
| 7. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 39 | 76.0 Mbps |
| 8. | Ncnet | 787 | 75.9 Mbps |
| 9. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tyumen' branch | 71 | 65.5 Mbps |
| 10. | Vdsina | 112 | 62.2 Mbps |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Samara branch | 43 | 57.7 Mbps |
| 12. | SkyNet Networks | 534 | 56.9 Mbps |
| 13. | Rostelecom Nets | 112 | 56.2 Mbps |
| 14. | papa.nas.msk.rnd.pg19.ru | 10 | 51.3 Mbps |
| 15. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 64 | 49.9 Mbps |
| 16. | Rostelecom networks | 32 | 49.5 Mbps |
| 17. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 73 | 49.2 Mbps |
| 18. | MediaServicePlus LLC | 261 | 47.3 Mbps |
| 19. | NTXv6 | 19 | 46.6 Mbps |
| 20. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 10 | 44.1 Mbps |
| 21. | New Telesystems, Ltd. | 11 | 41.9 Mbps |
| 22. | Teleskan-Intercom Ltd | 15 | 40.6 Mbps |
| 23. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Irkutsk branch | 23 | 38.5 Mbps |
| 24. | Llc Baxet | 18 | 38.2 Mbps |
| 25. | Tunnelbroker | 420 | 32.6 Mbps |