These graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Russian Federation over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
---|---|---|
1. | Ncnet | 211 |
2. | Mts Pjsc | 209 |
3. | Megafon | 175 |
4. | PJSC Rostelecom | 151 |
5. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 109 |
6. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 91 |
7. | Network Management Ltd | 72 |
8. | Skynet Ltd | 64 |
9. | Tunnelbroker | 60 |
10. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 39 |
11. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Perm' branch | 32 |
12. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Barnaul branch | 27 |
13. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 26 |
14. | Tis-dialog | 26 |
15. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Bryansk branch | 26 |
16. | CJSC MegaFon center | 25 |
17. | PIN morespecific | 23 |
18. | PJSC MegaFon | 21 |
19. | Pin Dc | 19 |
20. | Yandex Llc | 18 |
21. | Ooo "ni" | 17 |
22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Bryansk branch | 16 |
23. | NetAssist | 16 |
24. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 15 |
25. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 14 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
---|---|---|
1. | Mts Pjsc | 154 |
2. | Ncnet | 111 |
3. | Megafon | 96 |
4. | PJSC Rostelecom | 95 |
5. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 71 |
6. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 68 |
7. | Skynet Ltd | 39 |
8. | Tunnelbroker | 37 |
9. | Network Management Ltd | 31 |
10. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 28 |
11. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Perm' branch | 23 |
12. | Pin Dc | 19 |
13. | PJSC MegaFon | 18 |
14. | CJSC MegaFon center | 18 |
15. | Yandex Llc | 18 |
16. | Tis-dialog | 17 |
17. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Barnaul branch | 14 |
18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 14 |
19. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saint-Petersburg branch | 12 |
20. | Rostelecom Nets | 9 |
21. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 9 |
22. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 9 |
23. | NetAssist | 8 |
24. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Penza branch | 8 |
25. | Unc2 LLC | 8 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
2. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
3. | Pin Dc | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 19 | 100.0% |
4. | Gorizont Ltd | 9 | 1 | 11.1% | 8 | 88.9% |
5. | Metroset Ltd. | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 6 | 85.7% |
6. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saint-Petersburg branch | 13 | 3 | 23.1% | 10 | 76.9% |
7. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 14 | 4 | 28.6% | 10 | 71.4% |
8. | OOO Istranet | 7 | 2 | 28.6% | 5 | 71.4% |
9. | CJSC MegaFon center | 25 | 8 | 32.0% | 17 | 68.0% |
10. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 15 | 5 | 33.3% | 10 | 66.7% |
11. | PE Tsibrankov Konstantin Igorevich | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 4 | 66.7% |
12. | Melbikomas UAB | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 4 | 66.7% |
13. | PIN morespecific | 23 | 8 | 34.8% | 15 | 65.2% |
14. | Ooo "ni" | 17 | 6 | 35.3% | 11 | 64.7% |
15. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 39 | 14 | 35.9% | 25 | 64.1% |
16. | Bigtelecom Closed JSC | 11 | 4 | 36.4% | 7 | 63.6% |
17. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 8 | 3 | 37.5% | 5 | 62.5% |
18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 8 | 3 | 37.5% | 5 | 62.5% |
19. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 8 | 3 | 37.5% | 5 | 62.5% |
20. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Perm' branch | 32 | 12 | 37.5% | 20 | 62.5% |
21. | Insys Llc | 5 | 2 | 40.0% | 3 | 60.0% |
22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 5 | 2 | 40.0% | 3 | 60.0% |
23. | Ncnet | 211 | 85 | 40.3% | 126 | 59.7% |
24. | Tis-dialog | 26 | 11 | 42.3% | 15 | 57.7% |
25. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 91 | 39 | 42.9% | 52 | 57.1% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 91 | 99.1 Mbps |
2. | CJSC MegaFon center | 25 | 98.3 Mbps |
3. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 26 | 85.3 Mbps |
4. | Ncnet | 211 | 69.2 Mbps |
5. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 109 | 49.5 Mbps |
6. | PJSC MegaFon | 21 | 45.0 Mbps |
7. | Skynet Ltd | 64 | 42.1 Mbps |
8. | Ip Server Llc | 9 | 35.5 Mbps |
9. | PJSC Rostelecom | 151 | 34.4 Mbps |
10. | Tunnelbroker | 60 | 31.8 Mbps |
11. | Network Management Ltd | 72 | 29.5 Mbps |
12. | OOO "Post ltd" | 6 | 24.0 Mbps |
13. | Mts Pjsc | 209 | 23.7 Mbps |
14. | Gorizont Ltd | 9 | 18.0 Mbps |
15. | OOO Istranet | 7 | 16.2 Mbps |
16. | Bigtelecom Closed JSC | 11 | 15.7 Mbps |
17. | Megafon | 175 | 11.6 Mbps |
18. | PE Tsibrankov Konstantin Igorevich | 6 | 8.3 Mbps |
19. | NTX Technologies s.r.o. | 6 | 8.0 Mbps |
20. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 10 | 6.2 Mbps |
21. | Ooo "ni" | 17 | 5.3 Mbps |
22. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 14 | 4.6 Mbps |
23. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 8 | 0.0 Mbps |
24. | Pin Dc | 19 | 0.0 Mbps |
25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Lipetsk branch | 6 | 0.0 Mbps |