IPv6 in Russian FederationThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Russian Federation over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | PJSC Rostelecom | 532 |
| 2. | Network Management Ltd | 380 |
| 3. | Yandex Llc | 340 |
| 4. | Mts Pjsc | 329 |
| 5. | Ncnet | 312 |
| 6. | Megafon | 311 |
| 7. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Kirov branch | 283 |
| 8. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 274 |
| 9. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 254 |
| 10. | Tunnelbroker | 111 |
| 11. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 101 |
| 12. | Closed Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom | 88 |
| 13. | Skynet Ltd | 68 |
| 14. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 64 |
| 15. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 63 |
| 16. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Bryansk branch | 40 |
| 17. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 36 |
| 18. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 27 |
| 19. | Llc Baxet | 27 |
| 20. | OOO "Post ltd" | 26 |
| 21. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Penza branch | 25 |
| 22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saratov branch | 23 |
| 23. | Metroset Ltd. | 23 |
| 24. | Unc2 LLC | 22 |
| 25. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 22 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Yandex Llc | 280 |
| 2. | PJSC Rostelecom | 277 |
| 3. | Mts Pjsc | 233 |
| 4. | Megafon | 202 |
| 5. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 172 |
| 6. | Ncnet | 172 |
| 7. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 124 |
| 8. | Network Management Ltd | 115 |
| 9. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 70 |
| 10. | Tunnelbroker | 54 |
| 11. | Skynet Ltd | 42 |
| 12. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 38 |
| 13. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 24 |
| 14. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 22 |
| 15. | Closed Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom | 21 |
| 16. | OOO "Post ltd" | 19 |
| 17. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | 17 |
| 18. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 16 |
| 19. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Perm' branch | 15 |
| 20. | Metroset Ltd. | 14 |
| 21. | "OBIT" Ltd | 14 |
| 22. | Tis-dialog | 14 |
| 23. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Penza branch | 13 |
| 24. | Llc Baxet | 13 |
| 25. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Kirov branch | 13 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Kurgan branch | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 2. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 22 | 100.0% |
| 3. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 12 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 100.0% |
| 4. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 63 | 0 | 0.0% | 63 | 100.0% |
| 5. | Gorizont Ltd | 20 | 0 | 0.0% | 20 | 100.0% |
| 6. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ryazan' branch | 27 | 0 | 0.0% | 27 | 100.0% |
| 7. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Penza branch | 25 | 0 | 0.0% | 25 | 100.0% |
| 8. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tula branch | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 9. | Bigtelecom Closed JSC | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 100.0% |
| 10. | Biterika Group LLC | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ul'yanovsk branch | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 12. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Samara branch | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 13. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Tyumen' branch | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 14. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Samara branch | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 15. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 16. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 16 | 0 | 0.0% | 16 | 100.0% |
| 17. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Barnaul branch | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 100.0% |
| 18. | Mikhail Mayorov | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 19. | Wiland Ltd | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 20. | Hosting Solution Ltd. | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 100.0% |
| 21. | "OBIT" Ltd | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 22 | 100.0% |
| 22. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Saint-Petersburg branch | 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 23. | Ooo "ni" | 17 | 0 | 0.0% | 17 | 100.0% |
| 24. | Insys Llc | 12 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 100.0% |
| 25. | Pin Dc | 9 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 100.0% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 8 | 253.3 Mbps |
| 2. | Metroset Ltd. | 23 | 204.9 Mbps |
| 3. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Rostov-na-Donu branch | 12 | 182.4 Mbps |
| 4. | Filanco ltd | 7 | 138.2 Mbps |
| 5. | Moscow Local Telephone Network (OAO MGTS) | 254 | 130.6 Mbps |
| 6. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Nizhny Novgorod branch | 63 | 130.4 Mbps |
| 7. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ul'yanovsk branch | 10 | 127.7 Mbps |
| 8. | MiraLogic Telecommunication Systems | 64 | 100.0 Mbps |
| 9. | Skynet Ltd | 68 | 95.9 Mbps |
| 10. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Volgograd branch | 7 | 80.9 Mbps |
| 11. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Yekaterinburg branch | 16 | 79.3 Mbps |
| 12. | "OBIT" Ltd | 22 | 78.9 Mbps |
| 13. | Ncnet | 312 | 78.6 Mbps |
| 14. | Rostelecom Nets | 17 | 74.1 Mbps |
| 15. | Network Management Ltd | 380 | 72.2 Mbps |
| 16. | Lancom Ltd. | 15 | 67.8 Mbps |
| 17. | Cloudflare, Inc. | 101 | 67.0 Mbps |
| 18. | CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Ul'yanovsk branch | 6 | 65.6 Mbps |
| 19. | Jsc Iot | 14 | 48.4 Mbps |
| 20. | PJSC "Vimpelcom" | 36 | 39.9 Mbps |
| 21. | JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" Irkutsk branch | 11 | 39.5 Mbps |
| 22. | PJSC Rostelecom | 532 | 38.9 Mbps |
| 23. | LLC "Internet Tehnologii" | 22 | 36.0 Mbps |
| 24. | Mts Pjsc | 329 | 35.5 Mbps |
| 25. | Llc Baxet | 27 | 30.7 Mbps |