IPv6 in Hong KongThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Hong Kong over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hktims | 635 |
| 2. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 220 |
| 3. | CT Networks | 115 |
| 4. | LeaseWeb Asia Pacific | 75 |
| 5. | China Unicom Network | 59 |
| 6. | Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Mass Internet | 53 |
| 7. | Wtt | 26 |
| 8. | Netvigator | 25 |
| 9. | Cngi-cernet2 | 21 |
| 10. | Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd | 20 |
| 11. | Digicore Limited | 17 |
| 12. | China Next Generation Internet CERNET2 | 16 |
| 13. | China Mobile | 16 |
| 14. | Hurricane Electric | 14 |
| 15. | HostUS Solutions LLC | 14 |
| 16. | ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 13 |
| 17. | Hong Kong Five Towns Development Co. Ltd | 9 |
| 18. | Hostus-hkg | 7 |
| 19. | Cloud Valley Technology Limited | 7 |
| 20. | HostBaltic | 7 |
| 21. | Cernet2-tsinghua6 | 6 |
| 22. | Ntdkl | 5 |
| 23. | CTM Internet Service | 5 |
| 24. | No.31, Jin-rong Street | 5 |
| 25. | Hkcable | 5 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hktims | 251 |
| 2. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 108 |
| 3. | CT Networks | 75 |
| 4. | Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Mass Internet | 30 |
| 5. | China Unicom Network | 25 |
| 6. | Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd | 15 |
| 7. | China Mobile | 15 |
| 8. | Cngi-cernet2 | 14 |
| 9. | Netvigator | 14 |
| 10. | Digicore Limited | 12 |
| 11. | Hurricane Electric | 10 |
| 12. | Wtt | 10 |
| 13. | ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 9 |
| 14. | China Next Generation Internet CERNET2 | 8 |
| 15. | Hostus-hkg | 7 |
| 16. | Hkcable | 4 |
| 17. | Beijing Fengniao Network Technology Co | 4 |
| 18. | Cloud Valley Technology Limited | 4 |
| 19. | HostUS Solutions LLC | 4 |
| 20. | HostBaltic | 3 |
| 21. | Hong Kong Five Towns Development Co. Ltd | 3 |
| 22. | CTM Internet Service | 2 |
| 23. | Ntdkl | 2 |
| 24. | No.31, Jin-rong Street | 2 |
| 25. | Cernet2-tsinghua6 | 1 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Cloud Valley Technology Limited | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 2. | Ntdkl | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 3. | No.31, Jin-rong Street | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 4. | Cngi-cernet2 | 21 | 0 | 0.0% | 21 | 100.0% |
| 5. | ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | 12 | 92.3% |
| 6. | HostBaltic | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 6 | 85.7% |
| 7. | Cernet2-tsinghua6 | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 5 | 83.3% |
| 8. | China Mobile | 16 | 3 | 18.8% | 13 | 81.3% |
| 9. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 220 | 55 | 25.0% | 165 | 75.0% |
| 10. | Hktims | 635 | 172 | 27.1% | 463 | 72.9% |
| 11. | Wtt | 26 | 8 | 30.8% | 18 | 69.2% |
| 12. | China Next Generation Internet CERNET2 | 16 | 5 | 31.3% | 11 | 68.8% |
| 13. | Hurricane Electric | 14 | 5 | 35.7% | 9 | 64.3% |
| 14. | CT Networks | 115 | 54 | 47.0% | 61 | 53.0% |
| 15. | CTM Internet Service | 5 | 3 | 60.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
| 16. | Hong Kong Five Towns Development Co. Ltd | 9 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 33.3% |
| 17. | China Unicom Network | 59 | 40 | 67.8% | 19 | 32.2% |
| 18. | Netvigator | 25 | 19 | 76.0% | 6 | 24.0% |
| 19. | Beijing Fengniao Network Technology Co | 5 | 4 | 80.0% | 1 | 20.0% |
| 20. | Hostus-hkg | 7 | 6 | 85.7% | 1 | 14.3% |
| 21. | Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Mass Internet | 53 | 47 | 88.7% | 6 | 11.3% |
| 22. | Digicore Limited | 17 | 16 | 94.1% | 1 | 5.9% |
| 23. | LeaseWeb Asia Pacific | 75 | 75 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 24. | Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd | 20 | 20 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 25. | HostUS Solutions LLC | 14 | 14 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 220 | 22.0 Mbps |
| 2. | Digicore Limited | 17 | 17.5 Mbps |
| 3. | Hktims | 635 | 16.3 Mbps |
| 4. | Netvigator | 25 | 7.6 Mbps |
| 5. | Wtt | 26 | 5.3 Mbps |
| 6. | Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Mass Internet | 53 | 3.2 Mbps |
| 7. | Hurricane Electric | 14 | 3.0 Mbps |
| 8. | Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd | 20 | 0.1 Mbps |
| 9. | Cngi-cernet2 | 21 | 0.1 Mbps |
| 10. | ARTERIA Networks Corporation | 13 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 11. | Hkcable | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 12. | No.31, Jin-rong Street | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 13. | Hostus-hkg | 7 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 14. | Hong Kong Five Towns Development Co. Ltd | 9 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 15. | Ntdkl | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 16. | China Next Generation Internet CERNET2 | 16 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 17. | Beijing Fengniao Network Technology Co | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 18. | CTM Internet Service | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 19. | HostUS Solutions LLC | 14 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 20. | HostBaltic | 7 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 21. | CT Networks | 115 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 22. | Cernet2-tsinghua6 | 6 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 23. | China Unicom Network | 59 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 24. | China Mobile | 16 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 25. | LeaseWeb Asia Pacific | 75 | 0.0 Mbps |