IPv6 in United KingdomThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in United Kingdom over time. They are generated using the data collected by tens of thousands of tests that are done monthly at the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
The graph below shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test. The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hurricane Electric | 883 |
| 2. | Aaisp | 222 |
| 3. | Goscomb Technologies Limited | 184 |
| 4. | GYRON Gyron Internet Ltd AS29017 | 154 |
| 5. | Easynet Group plc | 110 |
| 6. | Moscow State University | 88 |
| 7. | ENTANET International Ltd | 86 |
| 8. | Infinity Developments Limited | 50 |
| 9. | MCKAYCOM Ltd | 39 |
| 10. | gogo6 Inc. | 36 |
| 11. | Janet | 29 |
| 12. | Ntl-uk | 25 |
| 13. | Linode | 22 |
| 14. | Tiscali UK Limited | 21 |
| 15. | Uk-global | 7 |
| 16. | BT Public Internet Service | 7 |
| 17. | COLT network | 6 |
| 18. | Opal | 6 |
| 19. | 4D Address range | 5 |
| 20. | Heanet | 5 |
| 21. | BSkyB Broadband | 5 |
| 22. | Bt | 5 |
The graph below shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test. The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Hurricane Electric | 353 |
| 2. | Aaisp | 139 |
| 3. | Goscomb Technologies Limited | 122 |
| 4. | Easynet Group plc | 79 |
| 5. | ENTANET International Ltd | 57 |
| 6. | GYRON Gyron Internet Ltd AS29017 | 57 |
| 7. | Moscow State University | 50 |
| 8. | Infinity Developments Limited | 26 |
| 9. | gogo6 Inc. | 17 |
| 10. | Ntl-uk | 17 |
| 11. | Janet | 17 |
| 12. | Tiscali UK Limited | 13 |
| 13. | MCKAYCOM Ltd | 12 |
| 14. | Uk-global | 7 |
| 15. | COLT network | 5 |
| 16. | BT Public Internet Service | 5 |
| 17. | Linode | 4 |
| 18. | BSkyB Broadband | 4 |
| 19. | 4D Address range | 4 |
| 20. | Opal | 3 |
| 21. | Bt | 2 |
| 22. | Heanet | 2 |
The graph below shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test. Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the red bars will grow taller than the blue ones.
The graph below shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity. Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Linode | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 22 | 100.0% |
| 2. | Uk-global | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 3. | MCKAYCOM Ltd | 39 | 0 | 0.0% | 39 | 100.0% |
| 4. | GYRON Gyron Internet Ltd AS29017 | 154 | 22 | 14.3% | 132 | 85.7% |
| 5. | ENTANET International Ltd | 86 | 15 | 17.4% | 71 | 82.6% |
| 6. | Hurricane Electric | 883 | 167 | 18.9% | 716 | 81.1% |
| 7. | Bt | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | 4 | 80.0% |
| 8. | Infinity Developments Limited | 50 | 11 | 22.0% | 39 | 78.0% |
| 9. | Moscow State University | 88 | 25 | 28.4% | 63 | 71.6% |
| 10. | gogo6 Inc. | 36 | 12 | 33.3% | 24 | 66.7% |
| 11. | Goscomb Technologies Limited | 184 | 64 | 34.8% | 120 | 65.2% |
| 12. | 4D Address range | 5 | 2 | 40.0% | 3 | 60.0% |
| 13. | Aaisp | 222 | 100 | 45.0% | 122 | 55.0% |
| 14. | Easynet Group plc | 110 | 55 | 50.0% | 55 | 50.0% |
| 15. | Janet | 29 | 17 | 58.6% | 12 | 41.4% |
| 16. | Heanet | 5 | 3 | 60.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
| 17. | COLT network | 6 | 4 | 66.7% | 2 | 33.3% |
| 18. | Tiscali UK Limited | 21 | 16 | 76.2% | 5 | 23.8% |
| 19. | Ntl-uk | 25 | 21 | 84.0% | 4 | 16.0% |
| 20. | Opal | 6 | 6 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 21. | BSkyB Broadband | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 22. | BT Public Internet Service | 7 | 7 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Here you can see the evolution of address types over time, and measure usage of 6to4 and Teredo tunneled connectivity. It should be noted that because 6rd works with native addresses, it cannot be detected here as tunneled. This is also the case with VPN based tunnels.
This one illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed. The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Bt | 5 | 51.0 Mbps |
| 2. | 4D Address range | 5 | 40.4 Mbps |
| 3. | Moscow State University | 88 | 30.5 Mbps |
| 4. | Janet | 29 | 24.2 Mbps |
| 5. | Infinity Developments Limited | 50 | 21.7 Mbps |
| 6. | COLT network | 6 | 18.1 Mbps |
| 7. | Aaisp | 222 | 13.8 Mbps |
| 8. | GYRON Gyron Internet Ltd AS29017 | 154 | 12.2 Mbps |
| 9. | Easynet Group plc | 110 | 10.9 Mbps |
| 10. | Goscomb Technologies Limited | 184 | 9.7 Mbps |
| 11. | Ntl-uk | 25 | 4.8 Mbps |
| 12. | ENTANET International Ltd | 86 | 4.6 Mbps |
| 13. | Uk-global | 7 | 1.5 Mbps |
| 14. | Hurricane Electric | 883 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 15. | gogo6 Inc. | 36 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 16. | MCKAYCOM Ltd | 39 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 17. | Heanet | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 18. | BT Public Internet Service | 7 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 19. | Linode | 22 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 20. | Opal | 6 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 21. | BSkyB Broadband | 5 | 0.0 Mbps |
| 22. | Tiscali UK Limited | 21 | 0.0 Mbps |