IPv6 in NetherlandsThese graphs show the evolution of default protocol, v6 address types, and average bandwidth in Netherlands over time.
They are generated using the data collected by the ipv6-test.com connection test page, and are updated on a monthly basis.
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for all our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect almost 100% of hosts supporting IPv4 with a slow growth for IPv6.
| ISP | IPv6 tests count | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ziggo | 1,135 |
| 2. | Kpn B.v | 1,087 |
| 3. | XS4ALL networking | 827 |
| 4. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 750 |
| 5. | RIPE Network Coordination Center | 618 |
| 6. | Vodafone Ziggo | 213 |
| 7. | Upc Nl | 198 |
| 8. | HERN Labs AB | 191 |
| 9. | AirVPN network | 128 |
| 10. | ZeelandNet | 70 |
| 11. | RoutIT B.V. | 68 |
| 12. | Leaseweb | 65 |
| 13. | Kabeltex | 64 |
| 14. | 31173 Services AB | 55 |
| 15. | Vdsina | 55 |
| 16. | Host Sailor 2a04:dd00::/29 | 50 |
| 17. | Fcn | 45 |
| 18. | DigitalOcean, LLC | 44 |
| 19. | Choopa | 32 |
| 20. | Kpn B.v. | 26 |
| 21. | NForce Entertainment B.V. | 25 |
| 22. | Liteserver | 24 |
| 23. | Prolocation Nl | 23 |
| 24. | Ovpn | 22 |
| 25. | TransIP B.V. Amsterdam network | 22 |
This graph shows the evolution of IPv6 support vs IPv4 for unique users of our connection test.
The numbers are percentages, so we can expect a slow growth towards 50% v4 / 50% v6.
| ISP | Unique IPv6 addresses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ziggo | 675 |
| 2. | Kpn B.v | 597 |
| 3. | XS4ALL networking | 395 |
| 4. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 279 |
| 5. | RIPE Network Coordination Center | 253 |
| 6. | Upc Nl | 131 |
| 7. | Vodafone Ziggo | 119 |
| 8. | HERN Labs AB | 75 |
| 9. | AirVPN network | 39 |
| 10. | ZeelandNet | 39 |
| 11. | RoutIT B.V. | 28 |
| 12. | Leaseweb | 27 |
| 13. | Kpn B.v. | 23 |
| 14. | Ovpn | 18 |
| 15. | NForce Entertainment B.V. | 17 |
| 16. | Choopa | 17 |
| 17. | Kabeltex | 17 |
| 18. | M247 Ltd | 16 |
| 19. | RouteLabel | 16 |
| 20. | Host Sailor 2a04:dd00::/29 | 16 |
| 21. | 31173 Services AB | 14 |
| 22. | Prolocation Nl | 13 |
| 23. | DigitalOcean, LLC | 12 |
| 24. | Internet Assigned Numbers Authority | 12 |
| 25. | Interactive 3D | 11 |
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 when visiting the ipv6-test connection test.
Hopefully, in the not so distant future, the v6 part will grow taller than the v4 one.
This graph shows the percentage of browsers that default to IPv6 vs. IPv4 for users that have both v4 and v6 connectivity.
Usually a system will default to v6 when it's available, but in some cases with tunneled connections, v4 stays the default.
| ISP | Test count | IPv4 | IPv4 % | IPv6 | IPv6 % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Cambrium | 9 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 100.0% |
| 2. | Netrouting Network | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 100.0% |
| 3. | Ncnet | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 4. | DTAG European region | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 5. | SIT Internetdiensten B.V. | 12 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 100.0% |
| 6. | RouteLabel | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 19 | 100.0% |
| 7. | Art and Creation | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 100.0% |
| 8. | ECHELON network | 16 | 0 | 0.0% | 16 | 100.0% |
| 9. | Unitymedia | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 10. | Online S.A.S. | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 19 | 100.0% |
| 11. | RadioFibra S.R.L. | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | 15 | 100.0% |
| 12. | Exa-Omicron | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 100.0% |
| 13. | Microsoft Corporation | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 100.0% |
| 14. | Webzilla B.V. | 12 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 100.0% |
| 15. | Kabeltex | 64 | 1 | 1.6% | 63 | 98.4% |
| 16. | Upc Nl | 198 | 9 | 4.5% | 189 | 95.5% |
| 17. | Ovpn | 22 | 1 | 4.5% | 21 | 95.5% |
| 18. | RoutIT B.V. | 68 | 4 | 5.9% | 64 | 94.1% |
| 19. | Kpn B.v | 1,087 | 76 | 7.0% | 1,011 | 93.0% |
| 20. | Internet Assigned Numbers Authority | 14 | 1 | 7.1% | 13 | 92.9% |
| 21. | XS4ALL networking | 827 | 60 | 7.3% | 767 | 92.7% |
| 22. | Ziggo | 1,135 | 92 | 8.1% | 1,043 | 91.9% |
| 23. | Solcon | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | 11 | 91.7% |
| 24. | Vodafone Ziggo | 213 | 23 | 10.8% | 190 | 89.2% |
| 25. | ZeelandNet | 70 | 10 | 14.3% | 60 | 85.7% |
This graph illustrates the connection speed gap between IPv4 and IPv6, numbers represent v6 speed as percentage of v4 speed.
The lower IPv6 speeds are often caused by tunneling overhead or insufficient v6 connectivity or peering capacity at ISPs.
| ISP | Test count | IPv6 average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Kpn B.v | 1,087 | 134.3 Mbps |
| 2. | ZeelandNet | 70 | 131.1 Mbps |
| 3. | TransIP B.V. Amsterdam network | 22 | 113.7 Mbps |
| 4. | Cambrium | 9 | 113.7 Mbps |
| 5. | RoutIT B.V. | 68 | 97.1 Mbps |
| 6. | Ziggo | 1,135 | 88.1 Mbps |
| 7. | DigitalOcean, LLC | 44 | 87.0 Mbps |
| 8. | Lightstream Transmission and Telecom Inc | 8 | 86.6 Mbps |
| 9. | Vodafone Ziggo | 213 | 81.0 Mbps |
| 10. | Upc Nl | 198 | 73.1 Mbps |
| 11. | Exa-Omicron | 7 | 72.8 Mbps |
| 12. | XS4ALL networking | 827 | 68.8 Mbps |
| 13. | 31173 Services AB | 55 | 57.0 Mbps |
| 14. | Hurricane Electric LLC | 750 | 54.9 Mbps |
| 15. | Choopa | 32 | 52.0 Mbps |
| 16. | Kpn B.v. | 26 | 48.0 Mbps |
| 17. | Netrouting Network | 10 | 47.9 Mbps |
| 18. | Leaseweb | 65 | 47.0 Mbps |
| 19. | Solcon | 12 | 46.7 Mbps |
| 20. | RIPE Network Coordination Center | 618 | 42.1 Mbps |
| 21. | Worldstream | 19 | 37.2 Mbps |
| 22. | NForce Entertainment B.V. | 25 | 34.4 Mbps |
| 23. | Customer 1096 - 2a02:2ca0::/32 | 14 | 31.7 Mbps |
| 24. | HERN Labs AB | 191 | 30.7 Mbps |
| 25. | AirVPN network | 128 | 29.4 Mbps |